![]() ![]() (like the inside of a tornado), and what it feels like when antibiotics turn your colon into a water slide. There are also a lot of things the medical professionals don’t mention: the stench of stale milk emanating from the nutritional supplements stacked in a corner of your rented bedroom, the wild mood swings, the muscle spasms, the sound an oxygen tank makes when a valve breaks at 2 a.m. And, oh yeah, death is a distinct possibility. For a while, you won’t be able to lift anything heavier than a gallon of milk. They explain that you’re going to be allergic to grapefruit and turtles afterward. They give you documents explaining that you may die, what the cost of prescriptions will be and how high the risk of death is. They show you pictures of how physically wracked your body is going to be in the days after the procedure. ![]() The traditional wedding announcement rubs the reader's face mercilessly in a couple's perfection this one does the same thing with their flaws.There is a good chance you may die, they tell you, either during the surgery or while waiting for it. They constantly feature stories with questionable timelines that leave the reader thinking, with horror, 'Wait-what about the guy she was living with when they met at the Purim party? Here they just went all out. It's like the logical extension of a storyline the Times has been building towards for years. Others were happy for a wedding announcement that didn't read like a well-written LinkedIn profile: "Better than 'we were led to each other by careerist unicorns dropping rose petals,'" tweeted financial journalist Heidi Moore.īut how scandalous is this, really? Gawker weddings expert Phyllis Nefler, who has spent countless hours poring over the Times wedding section, explained that the Times has been probing the darker side of the "how did you meet" story for a while: "Easily the saddest story in the New York Times today," tweeted John Moe, host of the public radio show "Future Tense." "Dig the joyless onlookers." Slate film critic Dana Stevens found it "staggeringly monstrous:" "I'm waiting for the Modern Love column that's a rebuttal from the abandoned spouses." This story caused a bunch of people to spit orange juice all over their Sunday Times. In the announcement they were defensive but unapologetic: "I wanted to get up in the morning and read the paper with him," Riddell said. The two divorced from spouses 1.0 and got married. "I did a terrible thing as honorably as I could," Partilla told the Times. ![]() They claim they didn't have an affair, but quickly separated from their spouses. Five minutes later, he said, she returned and told him, "I feel exactly the same way." Then she left again. She jumped up, knocking a glass of beer into his lap, and rushed out of the bar. "I've fallen in love with you," he recalled saying to her. She said she knew something was up, because they had never met on their own before. Partilla invited her for a drink at O'Connell's, a neighborhood bar. They became friends and, as rich, skinny parents, they fell in love, obviously. How dare they disgrace the sanctity of the New York Times wedding section!įour years ago, former WNBC anchor Carol Anne Riddell, then 40, met the handsome president of media sales John Partilla, 42, at the Upper West Side school their kids attended. This weekend's New York Times wedding section tells the salacious tale of two people who coldly dumped their spouses for each other, and true love. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |